Русский Журнал – Тема недели

Русский журнал - тема недели 17 июня 2011

«Готовность к политическому злу»

Есть ли своя специфика у политического зла? Готовы ли правовые и политические институты современного мира к возвращению «политического зла»? Может ли «радикальное зло» вернуться в каком-либо виде? Насколько эффективна риторика зла в качестве политического инструмента? Есть ли какая-то альтернатива риторике зла? Изменилась ли каким-либо образом риторика, использующая терминологию «зла», после 1991 года?

На эти и многие другие вопросы отвечают: Ален Бадью – философ, один из самых оригинальных и влиятельных из ныне живущих французских мыслителей; Джон Болтон – американский политический деятель, дипломат, бывший посол ООН от США; Энвер Кисриев – российский социолог, кавказовед, заведующий сектором Кавказа Центра цивилизационных и региональных исследований РАН; Ашиш Нанди – один из самых уважаемых социальных, культурных и политических критиков в Индии; Абдусалам Гусейнов – действительный член РАН, директор Института философии РАН; Зигмунт Бауман – польско-английский социолог, профессор университета Лидса, автор книги «Актуальность Холокоста» и другие ученые, журналисты, исследователи.

Рубрика: Журнальный клуб Интелрос, Русский Журнал – Тема недели, Русский журнал - тема недели 17 июня 2011

Russian Journal - Standpoint of the week

issue #3 (59), April 27, 2011

The topic of the issue: ‘Think Tanks: The Battle of Progressive Manifestos’

Recently, the Russian public sphere has been overwhelmed with a wave of political manifestos, the authors of which have come from various Russian think tanks, including the Institute of Contemporary Development (INSOR), the Centre for Strategic Research Foundation, the Centre for Social and Conservative Policy, and the ‘Strategy-2020’ Civil Initiative Foundation. The fact that the reports of this genre have begun to appear on a large scale namely at this time leads to the question of whether this is related specifically with the impending elections or to the vacuum regarding a solid vision for the country’s future, which various interest groups are attempting to privatise nowadays? Are there any consensus points regarding possible changes that are agreed upon by all representatives of the expert community, irrespective of their ideological preferences? It seems that most of the reports issued are of a liberal and progressive nature. Does this mean that progressive liberals have managed to seize the initiative from the “guardians” or, at least, that they have managed to become a worthy alternative to them? Do think tanks promote progressive changes or are they conservative organizations which think only about their sponsors?

These and other questions are answered by the following experts: John Gray, a British political philosopher, author and former Professor of European Thought at the London School of Economics; Sergey Belanovsky, a Russian social scientist and the Research Director at the Centre for Strategic Research Foundation; Victor Vakhstein, a Russian social scientist and the Dean of the Faculty of Sociology and Political Science at the Moscow Higher School of Social and Economic Sciences; and James McGann, Senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute (Philadelphia, U.S.A.) and Director of its “Think Tanks and Foreign Policy” programme.

In this issue, readers will also read features from John Halpin, a Senior Researcher at the Centre for American Progress, and the creator and Co-director of the Centre’s Progressive Research Program; Vladislav Inozemtsev, a doctor of economic sciences and a publisher, who is currently the Editor-in-chief of the journal Svobodnaya mysl (‘Free thought’) and the Director of the Centre for Post-industrial Society Research; Boris Mezhuev, a political scientist and Deputy General Director of the ‘Strategy-2020’ Civil Initiative Foundation; and Alexander Cockburn, co-editor of CounterPunch, a columnist for The Nation, and a member of the editorial board of the New Left Review

Рубрика: Журнальный клуб Интелрос, Русский Журнал – Тема недели, RJ - issue #3 (59) 2011